<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 9 Ways to Beat the High Cost of Photography</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography</link>
	<description>Beautiful Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Haleh</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-30626</link>
		<dc:creator>Haleh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Dec 2011 01:37:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-30626</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting useful tips for better photography.

There is another alternative for photoshop which is light room.Easier than GIMP!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting useful tips for better photography.</p>
<p>There is another alternative for photoshop which is light room.Easier than GIMP!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: photo</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-19482</link>
		<dc:creator>photo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:25:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-19482</guid>
		<description>Hi , thanks for the posting. Nice. There are many ways to get rid of hair issues, but first know that bad hair is usually the result of unclean hair and scalp, it is also due to the use of excessive hair product, which usually grab on to your hair making it heavy and dry. Chemical hair products also clog hair pores killing the health of your hair</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi , thanks for the posting. Nice. There are many ways to get rid of hair issues, but first know that bad hair is usually the result of unclean hair and scalp, it is also due to the use of excessive hair product, which usually grab on to your hair making it heavy and dry. Chemical hair products also clog hair pores killing the health of your hair</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-12442</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 11:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-12442</guid>
		<description>I have both a hiking rucksac (Berghaus Freelow 35+8) and a Lowpro Primus Camera Rucksack and although my hiking one has given me many miles of hassle free photography (and is a great bag anyway), the Lowe Pro one is just easier.  With the custom made camera compartments and tripod holder it makes changing lens much easier.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SO - Whilst I agree a bag that screams - ROB ME! - is not the best choice, there are other more discreet ones, like the range from Kata etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have both a hiking rucksac (Berghaus Freelow 35+8) and a Lowpro Primus Camera Rucksack and although my hiking one has given me many miles of hassle free photography (and is a great bag anyway), the Lowe Pro one is just easier.  With the custom made camera compartments and tripod holder it makes changing lens much easier.</p>
<p>SO &#8211; Whilst I agree a bag that screams &#8211; ROB ME! &#8211; is not the best choice, there are other more discreet ones, like the range from Kata etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Stone</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-11916</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Stone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 10:52:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-11916</guid>
		<description>This article is excellent with some very good sound advice. However, I would like to just make two points:
1. If you just have to get PhotoShop then get PhotoShop Elements - it costs 1/10th the proce of the full version &amp; will give you all that you will ever use in the full version. 
2. DO NOT buy a second hand camera body unless you definately know that it has been used very little. A highly used second camera is very likely to give you expensive problems in the end. Second hand glass is OK providing it is in good condition.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is excellent with some very good sound advice. However, I would like to just make two points:<br />
1. If you just have to get PhotoShop then get PhotoShop Elements &#8211; it costs 1/10th the proce of the full version &amp; will give you all that you will ever use in the full version.<br />
2. DO NOT buy a second hand camera body unless you definately know that it has been used very little. A highly used second camera is very likely to give you expensive problems in the end. Second hand glass is OK providing it is in good condition.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter Z</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-11878</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-11878</guid>
		<description>I would love to switch not just to GIMP, but to Ubuntu altogether. What is stopping me however is the batch processing in GIMP, I just don&#039;t like the scripting bit. I&#039;m sure it will be far more powerful than PS in recording mode, but I find it to much of a hassle.

Great write-up, cheers!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would love to switch not just to GIMP, but to Ubuntu altogether. What is stopping me however is the batch processing in GIMP, I just don&#8217;t like the scripting bit. I&#8217;m sure it will be far more powerful than PS in recording mode, but I find it to much of a hassle.</p>
<p>Great write-up, cheers!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LightStalking</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-11872</link>
		<dc:creator>LightStalking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 06:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-11872</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s exactly right Kyan! Most people try to compensate for lack of ability by buying more expensive gear and it simply doesn&#039;t work! 

Thanks for the ideas on Elements!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s exactly right Kyan! Most people try to compensate for lack of ability by buying more expensive gear and it simply doesn&#8217;t work! </p>
<p>Thanks for the ideas on Elements!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyan Blue</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-11867</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyan Blue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:37:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-11867</guid>
		<description>Excellent article!

I&#039;ve picked up photography as a hobby because I&#039;m very inspired by the work I see on the internet (I spend a lot of time browsing Flickr, too, which explains part of it). However, many costs (Photoshop or Lightroom, a DSLR) are rather prohibitive for me right now.

I did get Photoshop Elements, though, which is fairly decent for most photo-editing, especially if you&#039;re an amateur and not fully prepared to invest in a ton of software and equipment. There&#039;s some functionality that you lose with PSE compared to Photoshop CS-something, but there&#039;s a nifty set of actions called &#039;Grant&#039;s Tools&#039; that give you some helpful tools like Curves to process photos.

And hey, great photography doesn&#039;t mean you need an expensive camera. You can&#039;t really buy anything that teaches you good composition. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent article!</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve picked up photography as a hobby because I&#8217;m very inspired by the work I see on the internet (I spend a lot of time browsing Flickr, too, which explains part of it). However, many costs (Photoshop or Lightroom, a DSLR) are rather prohibitive for me right now.</p>
<p>I did get Photoshop Elements, though, which is fairly decent for most photo-editing, especially if you&#8217;re an amateur and not fully prepared to invest in a ton of software and equipment. There&#8217;s some functionality that you lose with PSE compared to Photoshop CS-something, but there&#8217;s a nifty set of actions called &#8216;Grant&#8217;s Tools&#8217; that give you some helpful tools like Curves to process photos.</p>
<p>And hey, great photography doesn&#8217;t mean you need an expensive camera. You can&#8217;t really buy anything that teaches you good composition. ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowie</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-11865</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:56:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-11865</guid>
		<description>@ admin : thanks! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ admin : thanks! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lowie</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-11864</link>
		<dc:creator>Lowie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-11864</guid>
		<description>@ healthhacker : Thanks! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ healthhacker : Thanks! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LightStalking</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/cost-of-photography#comment-11863</link>
		<dc:creator>LightStalking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2009 21:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=223#comment-11863</guid>
		<description>@Lowie - I was checking out the Nikon D60 the other day. It would certainly get a beginner started without breaking the bank. It has more limited settings than its more expensive cousins, but certainly has what you need to get to know how to use a DSLR - plus some of the pics people take on them are simply awesome!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Lowie &#8211; I was checking out the Nikon D60 the other day. It would certainly get a beginner started without breaking the bank. It has more limited settings than its more expensive cousins, but certainly has what you need to get to know how to use a DSLR &#8211; plus some of the pics people take on them are simply awesome!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 9/14 queries in 0.007 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 628/631 objects using memcached

Served from: www.lightstalking.com @ 2012-02-07 17:47:31 -->
