<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 17 Excellent Examples of Narrow Depth of Field</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field</link>
	<description>Beautiful Photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 19:33:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Light Stalking &#187; Depth of Field Strategies for Street Portraits</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-21928</link>
		<dc:creator>Light Stalking &#187; Depth of Field Strategies for Street Portraits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Feb 2011 23:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-21928</guid>
		<description>[...] depth of field, but never covered specific strategies. As a primer to this article, take a look at 17 excellent examples of narrow depth of field to get an idea of how depth of field can be applied to street [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] depth of field, but never covered specific strategies. As a primer to this article, take a look at 17 excellent examples of narrow depth of field to get an idea of how depth of field can be applied to street [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chalo84</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-13710</link>
		<dc:creator>chalo84</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 10:07:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-13710</guid>
		<description>There is an album called &quot;The world in f1.8&quot; . 
http://www.flickr.com/photos/chalo84/sets/72157624025504700/

I hope you enjoy it</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an album called &#8220;The world in f1.8&#8243; .<br />
<a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/chalo84/sets/72157624025504700/" rel="nofollow">http://www.flickr.com/photos/chalo84/sets/72157624025504700/</a></p>
<p>I hope you enjoy it</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Selected from the web &#8211; April 21st &#124; Neil Alexander, Manchester based outdoor, travel &#38; landscape photographer</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-13700</link>
		<dc:creator>Selected from the web &#8211; April 21st &#124; Neil Alexander, Manchester based outdoor, travel &#38; landscape photographer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 May 2010 08:27:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-13700</guid>
		<description>[...] PictureCorrectUsing the Mask Feature in Photoshop Adjustment Layers &#124; The Discerning Photographer17 Excellent Examples of Narrow Depth of Field &#124; Light StalkingEntrepreneurial Photographers Become Successful DevelopersStudio Lighting Made Easypatrik giardino [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PictureCorrectUsing the Mask Feature in Photoshop Adjustment Layers | The Discerning Photographer17 Excellent Examples of Narrow Depth of Field | Light StalkingEntrepreneurial Photographers Become Successful DevelopersStudio Lighting Made Easypatrik giardino [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-13275</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 21:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-13275</guid>
		<description>The 50mm is such a popular lens. I love my 50mm for my nikon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 50mm is such a popular lens. I love my 50mm for my nikon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-13238</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Apr 2010 03:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-13238</guid>
		<description>Anytime! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anthony</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-13226</link>
		<dc:creator>Anthony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2010 21:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-13226</guid>
		<description>Greg - good point, but in this case, it kind of depends on where you grew up and who / how you learned to shoot from, as shallow and narrow essentially mean the same thing.  When I started to shoot, I liked the results I got from slide film, but people older then me often referred to it as &quot;chrome&quot; or &quot;transparency&quot; film.  I&#039;ll watch how I use terms for the future articles.

Also - I think EVERYONE should own a 50mm f/1.8 lens regardless of what camera outfit you have.  It&#039;s cheap and produces great photos across the board!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg &#8211; good point, but in this case, it kind of depends on where you grew up and who / how you learned to shoot from, as shallow and narrow essentially mean the same thing.  When I started to shoot, I liked the results I got from slide film, but people older then me often referred to it as &#8220;chrome&#8221; or &#8220;transparency&#8221; film.  I&#8217;ll watch how I use terms for the future articles.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; I think EVERYONE should own a 50mm f/1.8 lens regardless of what camera outfit you have.  It&#8217;s cheap and produces great photos across the board!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LightStalking</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-13067</link>
		<dc:creator>LightStalking</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-13067</guid>
		<description>Anytime! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anytime! :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aimee Greeblemonkey</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-13016</link>
		<dc:creator>Aimee Greeblemonkey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 03:50:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-13016</guid>
		<description>These are fantastic. Thanks for sharing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are fantastic. Thanks for sharing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Panic</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-12993</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Panic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Apr 2010 12:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-12993</guid>
		<description>Greg - good point, but in this case, it kind of depends on where you grew up and who / how you learned to shoot from, as shallow and narrow essentially mean the same thing.  When I started to shoot, I liked the results I got from slide film, but people older then me often referred to it as &quot;chrome&quot; or &quot;transparency&quot; film.  I&#039;ll watch how I use terms for the future articles.

Also - I think EVERYONE should own a 50mm f/1.8 lens regardless of what camera outfit you have.  It&#039;s cheap and produces great photos across the board!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg &#8211; good point, but in this case, it kind of depends on where you grew up and who / how you learned to shoot from, as shallow and narrow essentially mean the same thing.  When I started to shoot, I liked the results I got from slide film, but people older then me often referred to it as &#8220;chrome&#8221; or &#8220;transparency&#8221; film.  I&#8217;ll watch how I use terms for the future articles.</p>
<p>Also &#8211; I think EVERYONE should own a 50mm f/1.8 lens regardless of what camera outfit you have.  It&#8217;s cheap and produces great photos across the board!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Baker</title>
		<link>http://www.lightstalking.com/narrow-depth-of-field#comment-12937</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 19:05:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.lightstalking.com/?p=850#comment-12937</guid>
		<description>Great selection of photos! Is it being pedantic to say it should be &quot;shallow&quot; depth of field rather than narrow? Possible, maybe I don&#039;t quite understand the concept! :)

G</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great selection of photos! Is it being pedantic to say it should be &#8220;shallow&#8221; depth of field rather than narrow? Possible, maybe I don&#8217;t quite understand the concept! :)</p>
<p>G</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using memcached
Page Caching using memcached
Database Caching 9/15 queries in 0.006 seconds using memcached
Object Caching 626/634 objects using memcached

Served from: www.lightstalking.com @ 2012-02-07 17:55:39 -->
