Clicky

How to Avoid Losing Your Photos With Offsite Backup Strategies

How to Avoid Losing Your Photos With Offsite Backup Strategies

Jason Row
Jason Row is a British born travel photographer now living in Ukraine. You can follow him on The Odessa Files. He also maintains a blog chronicling his exploits as an Expat in the former Soviet Union.
Jason Row

Latest Images

    A photo on Flickr
    A photo on Flickr
    A photo on Flickr
    A photo on Flickr
    A photo on Flickr

By on in Photography Websites 11 Comments ]

 

As photographers, most of us are fully aware of the consequences of not backing up our work. Indeed, as we take more and more images, over that same period of time, the chances of a hard drive failure also increases. I am sure that many of us have experienced the heart stopping feeling of booting your computer to find that some or all of your images are not accessible due to a hard drive error.

For this reason we back up our shots, sometimes once, sometimes twice, to hard drive and to archival DVDs. However, for photographers with large collections of important photographs, there is a further option that should be explored, offsite back up.

Why Offsite Photo Backup?

The reasons that you should consider an offsite back up are simple. Whilst backing up onsite can protect against hard drive failures, it does not protect against for example theft, fire or natural disasters. Of course this may never happen, and I hope that it doesn’t but if your photographs are a major source of income to you or have a high sentimental value then its worth taking them offsite.


Disaster can strike anytime by massdistraction, on Flickr

There are two main options for an offsite backup, a physical location or an online backup. Backing up to a physical location is basically storing a hard drive of your images in an alternate location. This can be as easy as at a friend’s house, your office, or in a safety deposit box at a a bank. The advantages are that it is a simple and cheap method, hard drives are not expensive and if using a friend or your office there are little or no overheads. Safety deposit boxes can also be rented fairly cheaply and offer a higher level of security. The big disadvantage of course is the sheer lack of convenience, your remote location may be some distance from you, and it may be difficult to regularly take back ups to your location.


One option for a physical offline backup by Stuart Conner, on Flickr

The obvious alternative is online backups. In recent years there have been a number of companies that allow you to upload your images to your own online space. This can be as simple as generic sharing sites such as box.net and dropbox.com to dedicated offsite data backup services such as crashplan.com and livedrive.com. Generic sharing sites are ok for casual, non important backups but for a more professional, feature laden service you should look at a dedicated service. These sites are particularly useful for storing cloned drives or backups from Aperture or Lightroom and will also sync selected folders from your computer whenever connected.


Generic sites can be a useful option by planetahuevo, on Flickr

The advantages that a dedicated online backup services can offer include such as file encryption and faster synchronization. A third option with an online strategy is to use photographic portfolio sites such as Zenfolio and SmugMug. These sites often have plans that give you unlimited space for storage, the disadvantage is that they are not really dedicated back up services so you cannot simply sync your photos automatically nor can you store other files such as important documents for your business etc.


Dedicated services offer better options by =http://www.flickr.com/people/seemingleeSee-ming Lee 李思明 SML[/url], on Flickr

Why NOT Online Backup?

The two biggest disadvantages of an online backup are cost and internet speed. Most dedicated backup sites have set plans, you pay for a certain number of GB per month. If you go beyond this you may find yourself stepping up to the next pricing plan and that can be a considerable price increase. For photographers taking serious amounts of images per month this could be a major consideration.

The other main disadvantage is internet connection speed. Not every area has access to ultra high speed connections and uploading several GB of images, can be a slow and laborious process. Another thing to consider is whether your internet service provider has a cap. Going over this may incur further costs. Lastly, when choosing an online backup, you need to consider the company you are using. Is it established and secure. Will it be around in 5-10 years time or are you going to have to move your backups to a new company?

An offsite back up strategy will be a personal choice, however if your images are your financial lifeblood, it should be considered vital. As we have said, you can go offsite by having your images on a hard drive at a secondary physical location and this is probably the cheaper option but for photographers taking large numbers of images per week, the best option is to use an online, offsite strategy as this will provide the easiest and most convenient way to back up

11 Comments

  • Lewallen:

    Ironic that you use images from Flickr but fail to mention it as one of the cloud backups for photos. They offer 1 TB of space for free and unlimited space for less than $3 a month. It’s probably the most versatile cloud service for images around.

    July 31, 2013 at 8:52 pmReply

  • Avatar of AndyWUKAndyWUK:

    I lost hundreds of photos when my HDD failed… Was gutted…. ALWAYS back up!!

    August 5, 2013 at 6:37 amReply

  • Petrus:

    I created a set of business processes for my photography business recently and the one major process that stands out above all is my post photo shoot back-up process. It incorporates most of the above, excluding the online backup strategy, as I have found internet speed still to slow to make this a worthwhile part of the process

    August 6, 2013 at 9:02 pmReply

  • robert mackin:

    There is nothing worst then losing a hard drive which contains, months of work. Online storage is definitively the way to go in the future. Especially if it is clouds based.

    August 12, 2013 at 7:11 amReply

  • Lanna:

    I have been using Backblaze for a while.
    You don’t need to send specific files, it just keeps uploading everything in hard drive except for program files.
    I really don’t think it bothers me when it comes to internet speed.
    As said, I also think online and cloud based back-ups are the future ;)

    August 26, 2013 at 12:28 amReply

Leave a Comment

Please fill in the fields below to leave a comment.

 

You can add images to your comment. NOTE: Right Click on Image. Select "Copy Image Location". Paste into popup by clicking here.

Recent Members