Raise your hands if you have had your photos critiqued before. Now if you have, do you remember receiving feedback that wasn't too useful? Perhaps it’s because the one giving the feedback didn't understand your situation. Or perhaps they didn’t understand what you wanted to show. At times people would even say a statements like “It’s nice” or “It’s okay” without explaining why they like it or why they see it that way. But there are also those who care to know, asking why you took the shot and why you chose to shoot it that way before giving their two cents worth.
As someone who wants to receive critique, don’t we all want to know how we can improve our craft? Don’t you like to hear why your photo works, why it doesn't and what you can do to make it work next time? There are different ways to critique, some more helpful than others. While there is no right or wrong way to give critique, it is important to know that most people would like to receive feedback that they can take back home and add to their learning. These kinds of feedback, one way or the other, can help improve a photographer’s shooting considerations.
Photo Critique as a Skill
Giving critique is a skill in itself. Sadly, not all photographers take the time to get better at providing critique effectively. This is quite alright though because it is a personal choice that has to be made. Again, critique is a skill, and skills improve over time with the right knowledge and continuous practice.
How should we critique then? Since photo critique is a detailed assessment of someone’s photograph, the key activity in critique is analysis. It does not consider whether feedback is negative or positive, but it is simply an analysis of what works and what doesn't. Often times critique can lead to negative feedback regarding an image because mistakes are often more noticeable than positives. Good feedback can be given too although compliments are usually given when there is something that is noticeably outstanding in an image.
Therefore, if we want to improve in the skill of photographic critique, there are things that we can start considering. Here are five things one should look into when giving critique:
1. Critique With the Intention to Help
There is no better way to critique than with good intentions. This allows you to be objective at the same time be able to point out what can be improved in a given photo. It is true that the truth can hurt and that negative feedback is necessary at times, but everyone is in the position to receive feedback that will help them get better. This is the very reason why people want critique for their work, right? They would want to see how they can progress. A helpful approach to critique is in fact valuable to the photographer.
2. Give a “Why” When Commenting on Technique
While it’s alright to comment on technique, be careful how to do it. Since some are more experienced than others, those on lower level skills can get lost in translation. If possible, try explaining why one should follow a certain technique because not knowing the how isn't too useful. For example, you can say to someone, “I think this photo isn't using the rule of thirds. You should use the rule of thirds.” Although this can be helpful, it is only a temporary approach since it doesn't really help the photographer assess the situation and improve their workflow. Instead, when commenting on technique, mention why a certain technique works better. For example, “I immediately see this flower as your main element but since it’s positioned at the center, my eyes wander at the sides and I get distracted with the things around. Try using the rule of thirds, so that the focus is limited to the flower and you get less distractions”. Knowing why something works will help the photographer adjust how they shoot next time.
3. Avoid Personal Bias
Your personal need may come in the way of effective photo critique. A photographer with a strong interest in HDR will probably want a lot of contrast and dynamic range in their images. Sometimes they find that an image with just enough contrast needs to have more. A purist who doesn’t like post-processing may feel that a surreal-looking landscape photo look very unnatural and would say that it’s better to keep it untouched. Here’s other example: “It’s a bad photo because it looks too sad and dark. It's better if the photo was about happy moments and the model should smile instead of frown”. Do you have your own biases? It is important to be aware of them to be more objective during critique.
4. Avoid Altering the Message.
Not all suggestions are helpful. Some can sometimes be confusing even if the intentions are good. For example, when you ask a photographer to crop a photo, there is risk in altering the message the photographer wants to convey. Does that mean suggesting to crop is a bad thing? Certainly not. The elements in a frame are there to create an idea. When you crop, you don't necessarily change the message, but removing and even adding key elements in a frame will.
Take a look at the photo below and try to get the message of the image. Do you have an answer? Here's mine: a bunch kids racing while mom and the youngest sib cheer on. Did you get the same idea or something similar? Now what if someone gives a critique like this? – “I think this would better if you cropped the photo closer and just focused on the kid on the right.” Let's imagine that it would have been a better shot if the shooter followed the suggestion. But what would happen to the message then? The problem is that the solution totally changed the whole concept of the photographer.
The same way, when say that it’s better if they shoot wider, higher, or lower, that may mean adding elements that were not there before which can again alter the message. What if there was too much clutter added to the image because of our suggestion? Therefore, it is best to consider the photographer's intention and our lack of information of the shooting situation. This will help us avoid making unnecessary assumptions that are not helpful when giving critique.
5. Avoid Short Statements That Offer No Direction.
Let’s be honest, we've done this, or at least, most of us have. Statements like “It’s nice”, “It’s beautiful”, “It works for me” are nice to hear, but may be too lacking. Unless the photographer just wants a compliment rather than a critique, you would want to give more information.
What if someone told you, “I don’t like this photo”, “It’s confusing”, or “It’s awful“? Aside from the fact that you want to unfriend them on Facebook, you’re now asking yourself what’s wrong with your photo. Wouldn't you want to know why they think that way?
Give the shooter a direction he can take by giving insight to why a photo works or why it doesn't. Comment on what you see or feel – “The photograph has a nice balance in color, the blur in the background really gives emphasis on the subject”, or “the angle of the face would look better if it shows the other ear because it feels as if the subject only has one ear”. It can be simple ones like “the image feels tilted”, or “I’m distracted with the objects behind the subject”.
Giving critique is indeed the art of giving advise. Being able to look into things objectively to give a detailed assessment of an image is an invaluable resource. It is helpful to those who are seeking direction to develop their skills. At the same time, it is a way for the one giving them to understand photography better.
If you want to learn more about how to give critique effectively, you can check out some of these other resources: