Did National Geographic Go Too Far With The Climate Change Polar Bear Photo?

You might recall the now iconic picture of the starving polar bear that National Geographic released some time back. Pinning the polar bear’s condition on the destructive forces of climate change, the magazine probably never imagined just how iconic – and divisive – the photo would become. After all, in these heady political times, the outrage machine swings left and right with impunity and National Geographic found themselves caught in the crosshairs.

Image via Pixabay from Pexels.com.

Now the publication is walking back its claims about the polar bear starving due to climate change saying they “went too far.” This is because the original footage captured by Paul Nicklen and Cristina Mittermeier was captioned “This is what starvation looks like.” National Geographic unilaterally decided to change the caption and, in effect, make it what some consider a piece of propaganda pushing a political agenda.

The descriptive text accompanying the video doesn’t let up on the tear-jerking language, describing in some detail how the polar bear limply drags its body along, a literal walking corpse that made the original videographers cry they were so overwhelmed by the scene. The video has gone on to become the most viewed video on the National Geographic website since its debut.

The latest August 2018 issue of National Geographic sheds some light on the situation with videographer Mittermeier bemoaning the photographers' loss of control over the narrative and expressing regrets that National Geographic took it in the direction they did.

In its apology, National Geographic attempted to explain itself, writing: “National Geographic went too far in drawing a definitive connection between climate change and a particular starving polar bear in the opening caption of our video about the animal. We said, ‘This is what climate change looks like.’ While science has established that there is a strong connection between melting sea ice and polar bears dying off, there is no way to know for certain why this bear was on the verge of death.”

Do you think they went too far? Tell us in the comments


s

About the author

Kehl Bayern

Kehl Bayern is a freelance writer and editor of Demagaga.

  • John says:

    Brave Journalists/Photogs helped in a big way to stop the Vietnam war 45 years ago, but have done little to none to stop climate change, only during the hottest days of summer is climate change newsworthy;-0

  • Jon Adams says:

    If it is accurate about a significant number of polar bears they might put that there, if because that is happening, and, they did not go to far because the climate is behaving differently, whatever the cause is, likely industrious pollution. Ocean animals suffer because of pollution. Who can say that video is really that wrong? Poor polar bear.

  • They gone too far cause the climate ain’t changing at all.
    it is a fallacy. That polar bear was starving after a period of hibernation, more common than we think…

  • cbzen says:

    What about the use of the word ’like’ did people not understand. NatGeo did not say this is what climate change ’is’.

  • John says:

    Isn’t it obvious that they went too far? Examples such as this one make me distrust the magazine’s contents.

    Report user

  • If you enjoyed the article, we'd really appreciate a shout out!

    >
    Skip to toolbar