The humble 85mm has long been regarded as the go to portrait lens. I have one, a Sony 85mm f/1.8, it’s my favourite lens and yet I do not use it to take portraits with.
Author: Jason Row
Jason has more than 35 years of experience as a professional photographer, videographer and stock shooter. You can get to know him better here.
The world around us is in constant change. Cities, towns, even the rural landscape are in a state of constant change. That change is imperceptible on a day to day basis but over the months and years, it can and often is quite dramatic. As photographers, often without even knowing it, we are capturing history. Today we are going to look at the importance of photographing places as they change.
As many of you that have followed my ramblings here at Light Stalking will know, a significant percentage of my income comes from stock, both stills but primarily video. Unlike stills, video generally needs some physical stabilisation when shooting. Even using IBIS and OIS – in body and optical stabilisation respectively, handheld video is often too shaky to make good stock video.
Tripods might not be a candidate when you think of technological advancements, yet the way we stabilize our images has moved on dramatically since the days I wrote that article. Today I want to revisit the pros, cons and alternatives to tripods.
Have you ever planned a shoot and waited for the perfect weather? How did that work out? The simple fact is that there is no such thing as perfect weather, or indeed perfect light. Waiting for it is folly.
There are some real advantages to doing a photography shoot with some form of time constraint. Like restricting yourself to one lens or shooting just 36 images, shooting in a time frame can be a real creativity boost and today, I am here to tell you why.
