Report Alleges Trump’s Inauguration Photos Altered to Make Crowd Appear Bigger

Share: 

The presidential inauguration is one of the largest gatherings to hit Washington, DC every four years.

And while every inaugural ceremony is different than the other, the current US President’s fete is drawing scrutiny from reporters that claim that, on President Trump’s direction, photographs of the crowds gathered to hear his speech on the Washington Mall were modified to make the crowds appear larger in a moment of Photoshop meets Stalin-era media standards.

Image via Leah Kelley from Pexels.com.

But did President Trump directly order a photographer to edit photos? That doesn’t seem to be the case as many reports are hinting.

PetaPixel reports that UK paper The Guardian says that President Trump personally directed that photos of his inaugural crowd be edited to appear larger.

If you will recall this issue was actually the source of some political fodder immediately following Trump’s inauguration as White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer was routinely lampooned in both the news and popular media for his claims that people turned out in “record numbers” for a ceremony that many report was under attended when compared with previous inaugural addresses.

Using a Freedom of Information Act request to obtain the information upon which The Guardian’s report is based, the UK-based paper says that documents sent to them by the US Department of the Interior reveal Trump’s frustrations with the inaugural crowd size issue, specifically media comparisons with former President Barack Obama’s speech attendance.

An unnamed official in The Guardian’s report that allegedly works with the National Park Services says that “she got the impression that President Trump wanted to see pictures that appeared to depict more spectators in the crowd.”

But then the similarly anonymous photographer responsible for cropping the photos claims that he was never told specifically to do so and he only did some simple cropping to focus in on the crowded portions of the address. He further asserted that cropping photos is a routine part of the job.

Of course, all of this would probably be less of an issue had Trump’s former Press Secretary Sean Spicer not told a press conference “This was the largest audience to ever witness an inauguration – period.”

What We Recommend to Improve Your Photography Fast

It's possible to get some pretty large improvements in your photography skills very fast be learning some fundamentals. Consider this the 80:20 rule of photography where 80% of the improvements will come from 20% of the learnable skills. Those fundamentals include camera craft, composition, understanding light and mastering post-production. Here are the premium guides we recommend.

  1. html cleaner  Easy DSLR –  Friend of Light Stalking, Ken Schultz has developed this course over several years and it still remains the single best source for mastering your camera by identifying the main things that are holding you back.
  2. Word to html  Understanding Composition – As one of the core elements of a good photograph, getting your head around composition is essential. Photzy's guide to the subject is an excellent introduction. Their follow-up on Advanced Composition is also well worth a read.
  3. Word to html  Understanding Light – Also by Photzy, the other essential part of photography is covered in this epic guide and followed up in Understanding Light, Part 2. This is fundamental stuff that every photographer should aim to master.
  4. Word to html  5 Minute Magic Lightroom Workflow – Understanding post production is one of the keys to photographs that you will be proud of. This short course by one of the best in the business will show you how an award-winning photographer does it.

About Author

Avatar

Kehl is our staff photography news writer and has over a decade of experience in online media and publishing and you can get to know him better here

An UNNAMED official in The Guardian’s report that ALLEGEDLY works with the National Park Services says that “she got the IMPRESSION that President Trump wanted to see pictures that appeared to depict more spectators in the crowd.”

This isn’t journalism. The reporter couldn’t even confirm that the source worked for the NPS and yet printed her “impression” as if it was a fact. We’re supposed to believe Trump did something dodgy based on one persons impression? More like a shoddy totally made up hit piece.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *