On many photography forums, the question what is the best lens for street photography (or any other type of photography for that matter) will pop up quite often. While the traditional answer for any gear related question is that the gear with you is always best, this doesn't really help. Well this great video addresses the actual question and tests 3 good contenders.
If you're not familiar with Kai Wong, formerly of Digital Rev, then you're in for a treat. His funny photography videos are legendary in the online world of photography and for this one he's looking at three of the classic lenses that are widely considered to be the best for street photography – the classic 50mm, 35mm and the 28mm.
A Quick Summary of Street Photography Lenses Tested
Here's a basic rundown of the video if you don't have time to watch it.
A 50mm Lens is good place to start for street photographers. It produces good contrast in your images. There is also little to no distortion on a 50mm as it is roughly the same field of view as the human eye. A 50mm is also very light weight.
As far as it's effects, it is flattering for people shots and the body proportions it produces are about right. You will often have to move back a bit because of longer focal length compared to the 35mm and 28mm. If you can't do that, which is often the case in street photography, then your image compositions might appear a bit too tight.
If you like Bokeh then you will want to go with the 50mm at it's easier to get a bokeh effect on this lens compared to the others. Better for subject-centric photos as this focal length in tight street situations will often mean you have to have the subject of your image as a major part of the composition (more so than a wider angle lens).
A 35mm Lens is a bit wider than the 50mm without too much distortion which is useful for getting people in context without distorting bodies and faces. Shooting at this focal length forces a photographer to get closer to the subject and scene which is often regarded as a desirable thing. It's good to move feet and into the scene as it usually results in more intimacy in a street scene.
Again, it comes down to personal preference. With the 35mm you cannot get the shallow depth of field of the 50mm (but it's not too far off). The 35mm is better for photographers who want to show their human subjects in the context of their environment.
A 28mm Lens is often regarded as too wide for street photography. You need to get very close to your subject and it's often considered bad for portraits (both conventional and full length). This focal length produces lots of distortion on people and is on the edge of what is usable for street photography. With such a wide lens, it can be hard to keep the background tidy which means it can be a little distracting. The big advantage though is that your human subjects will almost always be seen in the context of their surrounds.
What They Didn't Mention
A big oversight of the video was price. A 50mm f/1.8 lens is arguably the best value lens ever made (for both Nikon and Canon as well as many other manufacturers). It's price, compared to the others would be a big factor for many people.
- Canon 50mm f/1.8 – $110 on Amazon
- Nikon 50mm f/1.8 – $144 on Amazon
- Canon 35mm f/2 – $549 on Amazon
- Nikon 35mm f/1.8 – $526 on Amazon
- Canon 28mm f/1.8 – $459 on Amazon
- Nikon 28mm f/1.8 – $696 on Amazon
Conclusion
Kai seems to like the 50mm best, and still enjoys using the 35mm. The 28 comes dead last. This more or less coincides with conventional wisdom about what is the best lens for street photography, but as always, use what suits your tastes and style.
12 Comments
It would be great if you guys could expand your reviews beyond Nikon and Canon, adding Sony.
Not to forget Sigma Art series
Is this the same for full frame and crop sensor cameras
No its not. Ff 50mm, 35mm and 28 mm, apsc 35mm, 24mm and 18mm.
M4/3 25mm, 17mm, and 14mm. Here there is also the 20mm which is a better lens than 17 or 25 in my opinion.
For portraits i personally prefer the 85mm ( 60mm apsc or 45 m4/3) as it is much better than the 50 for such a purpose.
—– ”No is is not” ——- for APS-C or Full Frame?
The lens 50 35 &28 in this his is all for FF cameras. What about APC sensors that is what 75% of people use.
Personally, I like 85mm in the street, others might prefer 135mm. This is a bit like saying “what’s the best tool, a screwdriver a hammer or a drill?” It depends on the job at hand and what your goal is. If you want a scene with a lot of context go wide, if you want subject isolation go long. If you shoot many styles, just stick with 50mm as a do-anything Swiss army knife. There’s no rules in art, that’s the beauty of it.
I love my 28mm. Just need to be courageous and get close to your subjects. (Oh yeah, that’s a SONY 28mm – the camera of choice for many of my fellow photographers.)
The Sigma zoom 18-35mm Art , for aps-c, will be my next purchase ……… has a resolution that is scary , ( see review in Photozone) .
Thanks for the articles.
Greetings from Coruña, Spain
You won’t regret! I prefer the fix lens then zoom for quality.
I agree about the best lenses for street photos, but this article should mention the choice it is about the full frames cameras.
But in my view the camera choose, on the video Nikon and Canon, are not the best for street photos. The are not discreet, it attract attention by the size.
You should think the very high quality of Sony, Fuji in APSC size
And in the format 4/3, think for Olympus
With those smaller camera, you will be part of the tourist, so much less people will watch you the with Nikon or Canon.
I would be a great idea to show in picture or graphic the equivalent to full frame lens. with APS-C and 4/3 format.
(I would post or print that!)
ricoh gr i or ii…? small, discreet, pocketable, 16mp apsc sensor, 18.3mm (28mm FF equiv) f2.8 lens. $600ish used